Watan-Over the past decade, the United Arab Emirates has successfully marketed itself as a haven of tolerance and a regional hub for humanitarian work—through high-profile campaigns and aid missions spanning Yemen, Sudan, and Afghanistan.
But behind this benevolent image lies a calculated political strategy: Abu Dhabi uses “humanitarian aid” as a cover to consolidate its geopolitical influence and justify its military interventions.
Yemen: Aid and Fragmentation
Since joining the Saudi-led coalition in Yemen in 2015, the UAE has portrayed itself as a patron of humanitarian assistance in areas liberated from the Houthis. However, this aid has consistently aligned with military objectives—boosting its presence in Socotra, Aden, and Mocha, while supporting separatist militias like the Southern Transitional Council.
By constructing hospitals and distributing food, the UAE has entrenched a network of economic and security influence in southern Yemen, all while operating military bases and strategic ports behind the scenes.
According to human rights reports, Abu Dhabi has used this “aid” to purchase loyalty and sanitize its image internationally, despite involvement in serious civilian abuses, including the operation of secret prisons and the torture of detainees.
Sudan: Gold for Blood
The same strategy reappears in Sudan. On one hand, the UAE backs modest aid and relief initiatives; on the other, it is accused of financing and arming the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), a key player in the bloody civil war since 2023.
This dual approach is driven by Abu Dhabi’s aim to safeguard its interests in Sudan’s mining sector—particularly gold, a strategic resource targeted by Emirati companies.
While Emirati media highlights “reconstruction and development” in Sudan, in practice, the UAE is accused of perpetuating the conflict by empowering certain factions and exploiting the chaos to expand its political and economic clout.
Aid as a Tool for “Buying Legitimacy”
The UAE’s strategy turns humanitarian aid from a legal and ethical obligation into a political pressure instrument. Aid is tied to conditions that ensure leverage and control, and support is granted selectively to serve its agenda.
Abu Dhabi also invests heavily in relationships with international organizations to polish its image, despite its documented violations in Yemen, Libya, and Sudan.
Globally, the UAE spends lavishly on media campaigns and promotional reports that showcase its humanitarian role in a bid to offset mounting human rights criticism in UN forums and Western institutions.
Beyond “Aid Diplomacy”
At its core, the UAE views humanitarian work not as an ethical policy, but as a public relations tool. Aid is weaponized to whitewash military intervention and suppress potential domestic unrest.
For example, the recent exemption of Sudanese residents in the UAE from overstay fines is less a humanitarian gesture and more a temporary pacifier for an economically vital community. It also sends a PR message: “The UAE protects Sudanese people”—despite being accused of fueling the war destroying their homeland.
Ultimately, the UAE has transformed humanitarian aid into a multi-purpose political investment: legitimizing military influence, buying local loyalty, improving global perception, and managing internal social challenges.
As its regional interventions continue, this so-called “humanitarian diplomacy” increasingly appears to be just a facade—masking a broader imperial ambition that disregards human cost.
-
-
-
-
-
-
