From Algerian Roots to Israeli Power: Who Is the Controversial Shin Bet Chief David Zini?
David Zini rejects any hostage deal, sparking outrage from families and fueling claims of political favoritism.
Watan-The new head of Israel’s internal security agency Shin Bet (Shabak), David Zini, has sparked widespread controversy inside Israel after making shocking remarks in which he voiced his opposition to any prisoner exchange deal with Hamas in the Gaza Strip, asserting that the war is “existential” and must continue “to the very end.”
Zini’s stance infuriated the Forum of Hostage Families, which accused Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of appointing Zini specifically because—unlike his predecessor Ronen Bar—he rejects any deal that might end the war or lead to the release of Israeli captives.
Despite having no prior intelligence or geopolitical background, Netanyahu pushed forward with Zini’s appointment, a move that has drawn both public and political scrutiny.
Although Zini never formally entered politics like his father, he currently resides in the Keshit settlement in the occupied Syrian Golan Heights. He is 51 years old, married, and father to 11 children.
Zini spent many years in the Israeli military, serving in Lebanon and participating in high-profile operations. According to media reports, he was involved in the assassination of Hadi Nasrallah, son of former Hezbollah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah, and played a role in bringing the son’s body back into Israel.

Media outlets including Maariv report that Zini’s appointment was not purely professional, but rather influenced by personal and political ties—particularly through Sara Netanyahu, the Prime Minister’s wife, who is said to have played a decisive role in his selection.
Reports also suggest a close family link between David Zini’s brother, Shmuel Zini, and Simon Falic, a U.S.-based billionaire and long-time Netanyahu supporter. Falic allegedly hosted Sara Netanyahu and her son Yair at his Miami residence for nearly 70 days during the ongoing Gaza war.
These revelations have amplified concerns over political manipulation, the undermining of security leadership, and the increasingly blurred lines between military decisions and personal alliances amid a devastating war.





